kerryjiang/supersocket vs microsoft/kiota
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, supersocket and kiota both show healthy maintenance signals. supersocket last saw a commit 5 months ago with 3+ active contributors, while kiota was committed to 5 days ago with 13+ active contributors. supersocket is Apache-2.0-licensed while kiota is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
kerryjiang/supersocket
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
microsoft/kiota
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| supersocket | kiota | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,232 | 3,822 |
| Last commit | 5mo ago | 5d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 211 | 222 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 22% | 53% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? kerryjiang/supersocket · microsoft/kiota
Ask AI about kerryjiang/supersocket vs microsoft/kiota
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.