kerryjiang/supersocket vs studyzy/imewlconverter
kerryjiang/supersocket shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, supersocket shows healthier maintenance signals than imewlconverter. supersocket rates Healthy overall while imewlconverter rates Mixed. supersocket last saw a commit 5 months ago with 3+ active contributors, while imewlconverter last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. supersocket is Apache-2.0-licensed while imewlconverter is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
kerryjiang/supersocket
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
studyzy/imewlconverter
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 89% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| supersocket | imewlconverter | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,232 | 10,319 |
| Last commit | 5mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 211 | 88 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 22% | 33% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? kerryjiang/supersocket · studyzy/imewlconverter
Ask AI about kerryjiang/supersocket vs studyzy/imewlconverter
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.