kestra-io/kestra vs roughike/bottombar
kestra-io/kestra shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, kestra shows healthier maintenance signals than bottombar. kestra rates Healthy overall while bottombar rates Mixed. kestra was committed to 1 week ago with 27+ active contributors, while bottombar last saw a commit 5 years ago with 12+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
kestra-io/kestra
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 20% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
roughike/bottombar
Stale — last commit 5y ago
last commit was 5y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 82% of recent commits
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kestra | bottombar | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28,015 | 8,362 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 5y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 657 | 275 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 91% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? kestra-io/kestra · roughike/bottombar
Ask AI about kestra-io/kestra vs roughike/bottombar
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.