RepoPilot

kestra-io/kestra vs tencent/apijson

kestra-io/kestra shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, kestra shows healthier maintenance signals than apijson. kestra rates Healthy overall while apijson rates Mixed. kestra was committed to 1 week ago with 27+ active contributors, while apijson last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

kestra-io/kestra

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 27+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 20% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

tencent/apijson

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 82% of recent commits
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 8 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

kestraapijson
Stars28,01518,399
Last commit9d ago1mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Open issues657241
Has tests
Has CINo
Test coverage91%3%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeCC
Cycles00
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? kestra-io/kestra · tencent/apijson

Ask AI about kestra-io/kestra vs tencent/apijson

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.