kestra-io/kestra vs xuxueli/xxl-job
kestra-io/kestra shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, kestra shows healthier maintenance signals than xxl-job. kestra rates Healthy overall while xxl-job rates Mixed. kestra was committed to 1 week ago with 27+ active contributors, while xxl-job last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. kestra is Apache-2.0-licensed while xxl-job is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
kestra-io/kestra
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 20% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
xuxueli/xxl-job
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 95% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kestra | xxl-job | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28,015 | 30,516 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 657 | 74 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 91% | 12% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? kestra-io/kestra · xuxueli/xxl-job
Ask AI about kestra-io/kestra vs xuxueli/xxl-job
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.