RepoPilot

kevin-wayne/algs4 vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, algs4 and ruoyi-vue-pro both show mixed maintenance signals. algs4 last saw a commit 8 months ago with 3+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. algs4 is GPL-3.0-licensed while ruoyi-vue-pro is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

kevin-wayne/algs4

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 4mo ago

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

CI evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 4mo ago
  • 3 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 94% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 2w ago
  • 4 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

algs4ruoyi-vue-pro
Stars7,52339,049
Last commit8mo ago1mo ago
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
Open issues2523
Has testsUnknown
Has CIUnknown
Test coverage0%22%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? kevin-wayne/algs4 · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Ask AI about kevin-wayne/algs4 vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.