klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller vs sharex/sharex
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, bulk-crap-uninstaller and sharex both show mixed maintenance signals. bulk-crap-uninstaller was committed to 1 week ago with 17+ active contributors, while sharex was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. bulk-crap-uninstaller is Apache-2.0-licensed while sharex is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sharex/sharex
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 99% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| bulk-crap-uninstaller | sharex | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,134 | 39,471 |
| Last commit | 7d ago | 7d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 159 | 648 |
| Has tests | No | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller · sharex/sharex
Ask AI about klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller vs sharex/sharex
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.