knowm/xchange vs proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down
knowm/xchange shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, xchange shows healthier maintenance signals than proxyee-down. xchange rates Healthy overall while proxyee-down rates Mixed. xchange last saw a commit 2 months ago with 5+ active contributors, while proxyee-down last saw a commit 1 year ago with 7+ active contributors. xchange is MIT-licensed while proxyee-down is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
knowm/xchange →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| xchange | proxyee-down | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,063 | 24,751 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 346 | 214 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 70% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? knowm/xchange · proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down
Ask AI about knowm/xchange vs proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.