kong/insomnia vs usebruno/bruno
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, insomnia and bruno both show healthy maintenance signals. insomnia was committed to 5 days ago with 19+ active contributors, while bruno was committed to 5 days ago with 22+ active contributors. insomnia is Apache-2.0-licensed while bruno is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
kong/insomnia
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 1/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (1/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 18% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
usebruno/bruno
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| insomnia | bruno | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 40,006 | 46,918 |
| Last commit | 5d ago | 5d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 874 | 1,840 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 24% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? kong/insomnia · usebruno/bruno
Ask AI about kong/insomnia vs usebruno/bruno
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.