koush/androidasync vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than androidasync. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while androidasync rates Mixed. androidasync last saw a commit 3 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. androidasync is Other-licensed while ruoyi-vue-pro is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
koush/androidasync →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 3y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidasync | ruoyi-vue-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,543 | 37,021 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 355 | 3 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 31% | 32% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? koush/androidasync · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
Ask AI about koush/androidasync vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.