krzyzanowskim/cryptoswift vs reactivex/rxswift
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, cryptoswift and rxswift both show healthy maintenance signals. cryptoswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 26+ active contributors, while rxswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 45+ active contributors. cryptoswift is Other-licensed while rxswift is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
krzyzanowskim/cryptoswift →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
reactivex/rxswift →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cryptoswift | rxswift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10,545 | 24,644 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 4 | 10 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? krzyzanowskim/cryptoswift · reactivex/rxswift
Ask AI about krzyzanowskim/cryptoswift vs reactivex/rxswift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.