langchain-ai/langchain vs microsoft/autogen
langchain-ai/langchain shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, langchain shows healthier maintenance signals than autogen. langchain rates Healthy overall while autogen rates Mixed. langchain was committed to 2 weeks ago with 20+ active contributors, while autogen last saw a commit 5 months ago with 33+ active contributors. langchain is MIT-licensed while autogen is CC-BY-4.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
langchain-ai/langchain
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
microsoft/autogen
Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0)
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓33+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| langchain | autogen | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 145,659 | 60,503 |
| Last commit | 14d ago | 5mo ago |
| License | MIT | CC-BY-4.0 |
| Open issues | 447 | 996 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 60% | 32% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? langchain-ai/langchain · microsoft/autogen
Ask AI about langchain-ai/langchain vs microsoft/autogen
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.