langchain-ai/langchain vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, langchain and hackingtool both show healthy maintenance signals. langchain was committed to 1 week ago with 20+ active contributors, while hackingtool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 12+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
langchain-ai/langchain
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
z4nzu/hackingtool
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| langchain | hackingtool | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 145,659 | 79,138 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 24d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 447 | 132 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 60% | 29% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? langchain-ai/langchain · z4nzu/hackingtool
Ask AI about langchain-ai/langchain vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.