RepoPilot

langchain-ai/langgraph vs litestar-org/litestar

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of July 2026, langgraph and litestar both show healthy maintenance signals. langgraph was committed to today with 13+ active contributors, while litestar was committed to 3 days ago with 23+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

langchain-ai/langgraph

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 13 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

litestar-org/litestar

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 23+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

langgraphlitestar
Stars37,5798,344
Last committoday3d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues628296
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage19%10%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? langchain-ai/langgraph · litestar-org/litestar

Ask AI about langchain-ai/langgraph vs litestar-org/litestar

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.