lengstrom/fast-style-transfer vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
significant-gravitas/autogpt shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, autogpt shows healthier maintenance signals than fast-style-transfer. autogpt rates Healthy overall while fast-style-transfer rates Concerns. fast-style-transfer last saw a commit 2 years ago with 16+ active contributors, while autogpt was committed to today with 16+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lengstrom/fast-style-transfer →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 3y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 3y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 3y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 54% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓16 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
significant-gravitas/autogpt →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fast-style-transfer | autogpt | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10,971 | 185,180 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | today |
| License | — | Other |
| Open issues | 112 | 449 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lengstrom/fast-style-transfer · significant-gravitas/autogpt
Ask AI about lengstrom/fast-style-transfer vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.