lessica/trollfools vs reactivex/rxswift
reactivex/rxswift shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, rxswift shows healthier maintenance signals than trollfools. rxswift rates Healthy overall while trollfools rates Mixed. trollfools last saw a commit 2 months ago with 6+ active contributors, while rxswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 45+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lessica/trollfools →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 93% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
reactivex/rxswift →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| trollfools | rxswift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 3,490 | 24,644 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 0 | 10 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lessica/trollfools · reactivex/rxswift
Ask AI about lessica/trollfools vs reactivex/rxswift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.