lewagon/setup vs openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website
openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, openstreetmap-website shows healthier maintenance signals than setup. openstreetmap-website rates Healthy overall while setup rates Mixed. setup last saw a commit 2 months ago with 13+ active contributors, while openstreetmap-website last saw a commit 1 month ago with 10+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lewagon/setup →
Missing license — unclear to depend on
no license — legally unclear; no tests detected
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 46% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website →
Healthy across the board
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| setup | openstreetmap-website | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,599 | 2,712 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | — | GPL-2.0 |
| Open issues | 1 | 640 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lewagon/setup · openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website
Ask AI about lewagon/setup vs openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.