light-city/cplusplusthings vs nevcairiel/lavfilters
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, cplusplusthings and lavfilters both show mixed maintenance signals. cplusplusthings last saw a commit 4 months ago with 24+ active contributors, while lavfilters was committed to 2 weeks ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
light-city/cplusplusthings
Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
nevcairiel/lavfilters
Solo project — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cplusplusthings | lavfilters | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 43,414 | 9,129 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 19d ago |
| License | Unknown | GPL-2.0 |
| Open issues | 10 | 107 |
| Has tests | No | No |
| Has CI | No | No |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? light-city/cplusplusthings · nevcairiel/lavfilters
Ask AI about light-city/cplusplusthings vs nevcairiel/lavfilters
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.