lihaoyun6/quickrecorder vs onevcat/kingfisher
onevcat/kingfisher shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, kingfisher shows healthier maintenance signals than quickrecorder. kingfisher rates Healthy overall while quickrecorder rates Mixed. quickrecorder last saw a commit 1 year ago with 3+ active contributors, while kingfisher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors. quickrecorder is AGPL-3.0-licensed while kingfisher is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lihaoyun6/quickrecorder →
Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 11mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 11mo ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
onevcat/kingfisher →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| quickrecorder | kingfisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,249 | 24,322 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 160 | 173 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lihaoyun6/quickrecorder · onevcat/kingfisher
Ask AI about lihaoyun6/quickrecorder vs onevcat/kingfisher
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.