lihengming/spring-boot-api-project-seed vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
scwang90/smartrefreshlayout shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, smartrefreshlayout shows stronger maintenance signals than spring-boot-api-project-seed. smartrefreshlayout rates Mixed overall while spring-boot-api-project-seed rates Concerns. spring-boot-api-project-seed last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while smartrefreshlayout last saw a commit 1 year ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lihengming/spring-boot-api-project-seed →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
scwang90/smartrefreshlayout →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| spring-boot-api-project-seed | smartrefreshlayout | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,707 | 25,159 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 112 | 341 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 72% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? lihengming/spring-boot-api-project-seed · scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Ask AI about lihengming/spring-boot-api-project-seed vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.