lilittlecat/awesome-free-chatgpt vs nousresearch/hermes-agent
nousresearch/hermes-agent shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hermes-agent shows healthier maintenance signals than awesome-free-chatgpt. hermes-agent rates Healthy overall while awesome-free-chatgpt rates Mixed. awesome-free-chatgpt last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors, while hermes-agent was committed to today with 33+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lilittlecat/awesome-free-chatgpt →
Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 11mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 11mo ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
nousresearch/hermes-agent →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓33+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| awesome-free-chatgpt | hermes-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,043 | 204,243 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | today |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 106 | 24,041 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lilittlecat/awesome-free-chatgpt · nousresearch/hermes-agent
Ask AI about lilittlecat/awesome-free-chatgpt vs nousresearch/hermes-agent
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.