linuxbrew/brew vs neutraltone/awesome-stock-resources
neutraltone/awesome-stock-resources shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, awesome-stock-resources shows healthier maintenance signals than brew. awesome-stock-resources rates Healthy overall while brew rates Mixed. brew last saw a commit 7 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while awesome-stock-resources last saw a commit 4 months ago with 10+ active contributors. brew is BSD-2-Clause-licensed while awesome-stock-resources is CC0-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
linuxbrew/brew →
Stale — last commit 7y ago
last commit was 7y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 7y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 62% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓BSD-2-Clause licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
neutraltone/awesome-stock-resources →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 73% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| brew | awesome-stock-resources | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,654 | 14,152 |
| Last commit | 7y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | CC0-1.0 |
| Open issues | 0 | 64 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 1% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? linuxbrew/brew · neutraltone/awesome-stock-resources
Ask AI about linuxbrew/brew vs neutraltone/awesome-stock-resources
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.