lionsec/xerosploit vs ruby/ruby
ruby/ruby shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruby shows healthier maintenance signals than xerosploit. ruby rates Healthy overall while xerosploit rates Mixed. xerosploit last saw a commit 3 years ago with 5+ active contributors, while ruby last saw a commit 1 month ago with 27+ active contributors. xerosploit is GPL-3.0-licensed while ruby is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lionsec/xerosploit →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 3y ago…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ruby/ruby →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| xerosploit | ruby | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,181 | 23,573 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 290 | 585 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 18% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lionsec/xerosploit · ruby/ruby
Ask AI about lionsec/xerosploit vs ruby/ruby
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.