lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge vs sherlock-project/sherlock
sherlock-project/sherlock shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, sherlock shows healthier maintenance signals than stable-diffusion-webui-forge. sherlock rates Healthy overall while stable-diffusion-webui-forge rates Mixed. stable-diffusion-webui-forge last saw a commit 11 months ago with 26+ active contributors, while sherlock was committed to 1 day ago with 24+ active contributors. stable-diffusion-webui-forge is AGPL-3.0-licensed while sherlock is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge →
Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 10mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sherlock-project/sherlock →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| stable-diffusion-webui-forge | sherlock | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,545 | 85,525 |
| Last commit | 11mo ago | 1d ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 1,143 | 299 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 16% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge · sherlock-project/sherlock
Ask AI about lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge vs sherlock-project/sherlock
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.