lmax-exchange/disruptor vs netflix/eureka
netflix/eureka shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, eureka shows healthier maintenance signals than disruptor. eureka rates Healthy overall while disruptor rates Mixed. disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors, while eureka was committed to 3 weeks ago with 36+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lmax-exchange/disruptor
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
netflix/eureka
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓36+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 16% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| disruptor | eureka | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,326 | 12,738 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 23d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 17 | 138 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 41% | 36% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lmax-exchange/disruptor · netflix/eureka
Ask AI about lmax-exchange/disruptor vs netflix/eureka
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.