lmax-exchange/disruptor vs nhaarman/listviewanimations
lmax-exchange/disruptor shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, disruptor shows healthier maintenance signals than listviewanimations. disruptor rates Healthy overall while listviewanimations rates Mixed. disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors, while listviewanimations last saw a commit 9 years ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lmax-exchange/disruptor →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
nhaarman/listviewanimations →
Stale — last commit 10y ago
last commit was 10y ago; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 10y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| disruptor | listviewanimations | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,326 | 5,530 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 9y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 17 | 87 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 41% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? lmax-exchange/disruptor · nhaarman/listviewanimations
Ask AI about lmax-exchange/disruptor vs nhaarman/listviewanimations
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.