lmax-exchange/disruptor vs novicezk/midjourney-proxy
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, disruptor and midjourney-proxy both show mixed maintenance signals. disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors, while midjourney-proxy last saw a commit 1 year ago with 12+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lmax-exchange/disruptor
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
novicezk/midjourney-proxy
Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
test evidence incomplete; CI evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 9mo ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
- ✓Last commit 9mo ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| disruptor | midjourney-proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,326 | 5,284 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 17 | 170 |
| Has tests | ✓ | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 41% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? lmax-exchange/disruptor · novicezk/midjourney-proxy
Ask AI about lmax-exchange/disruptor vs novicezk/midjourney-proxy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.