lmax-exchange/disruptor vs ssssssss-team/spider-flow
lmax-exchange/disruptor shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, disruptor shows healthier maintenance signals than spider-flow. disruptor rates Healthy overall while spider-flow rates Mixed. disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors, while spider-flow last saw a commit 3 years ago with 15+ active contributors. disruptor is Apache-2.0-licensed while spider-flow is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lmax-exchange/disruptor →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ssssssss-team/spider-flow →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| disruptor | spider-flow | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,326 | 11,326 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 3y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 17 | 23 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 41% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? lmax-exchange/disruptor · ssssssss-team/spider-flow
Ask AI about lmax-exchange/disruptor vs ssssssss-team/spider-flow
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.