lmax-exchange/disruptor vs tencent/shadow
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, disruptor and shadow both show healthy maintenance signals. disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors, while shadow last saw a commit 3 months ago with 11+ active contributors. disruptor is Apache-2.0-licensed while shadow is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
lmax-exchange/disruptor →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tencent/shadow →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 83% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| disruptor | shadow | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,326 | 7,751 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 3mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 17 | 66 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 41% | 30% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? lmax-exchange/disruptor · tencent/shadow
Ask AI about lmax-exchange/disruptor vs tencent/shadow
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.