luckypennysoftware/automapper vs mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, automapper and wavefunctioncollapse both show mixed maintenance signals. automapper last saw a commit 2 months ago with 2+ active contributors, while wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 3 months ago with 14+ active contributors. Both use the Other license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
luckypennysoftware/automapper →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); top contributor handles 92% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| automapper | wavefunctioncollapse | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10,184 | 25,036 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | Other | Other |
| Open issues | 4 | 8 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 1% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? luckypennysoftware/automapper · mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
Ask AI about luckypennysoftware/automapper vs mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.