RepoPilot

macrozheng/springcloud-learning vs wuyouzhuguli/springall

wuyouzhuguli/springall shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, springall shows stronger maintenance signals than springcloud-learning. springall rates Mixed overall while springcloud-learning rates Concerns. springcloud-learning last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor, while springall last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

macrozheng/springcloud-learning

Concerns

Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

wuyouzhuguli/springall

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

MixedDependency

last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • No CI workflows detected
  • 3 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

springcloud-learningspringall
Stars6,92528,986
Last commit1y ago2y ago
LicenseMIT
Open issues035
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage78%28%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineConcerns signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? macrozheng/springcloud-learning · wuyouzhuguli/springall

Ask AI about macrozheng/springcloud-learning vs wuyouzhuguli/springall

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.