RepoPilot

mame/quine-relay vs ruby/ruby

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, quine-relay and ruby both show mixed maintenance signals. quine-relay was committed to 2 weeks ago with 1+ active contributor, while ruby was committed to 1 week ago with 23+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

mame/quine-relay

Mixed

Solo project — review before adopting

MixedDependency

single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected in the complete Git tree…

MixedFork & modify

no tests detected in the complete Git tree; license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…

  • Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
  • No tests detected in the complete Git tree
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

ruby/ruby

Mixed

Evidence incomplete — review before adopting

MixedDependency

license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable

MixedFork & modify

license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…

  • Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
  • Last commit today
  • 23+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

quine-relayruby
Stars14,59323,702
Last commit15d ago10d ago
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open issues18700
Has testsNo
Has CI
Test coverage0%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeCC
Cycles00
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? mame/quine-relay · ruby/ruby

Ask AI about mame/quine-relay vs ruby/ruby

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.