mamedev/mame vs microsoft/wsl
microsoft/wsl shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, wsl shows healthier maintenance signals than mame. wsl rates Healthy overall while mame rates Mixed. mame last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors, while wsl last saw a commit 1 month ago with 22+ active contributors. mame is Other-licensed while wsl is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mamedev/mame →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
microsoft/wsl →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mame | wsl | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10,131 | 32,194 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 776 | 953 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? mamedev/mame · microsoft/wsl
Ask AI about mamedev/mame vs microsoft/wsl
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.