manaflow-ai/cmux vs reactivex/rxswift
reactivex/rxswift shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, rxswift shows healthier maintenance signals than cmux. rxswift rates Healthy overall while cmux rates Mixed. cmux last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while rxswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 45+ active contributors. cmux is Other-licensed while rxswift is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
manaflow-ai/cmux →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
reactivex/rxswift →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cmux | rxswift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,605 | 24,644 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 1,669 | 10 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? manaflow-ai/cmux · reactivex/rxswift
Ask AI about manaflow-ai/cmux vs reactivex/rxswift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.