RepoPilot

mantinedev/mantine vs mui/material-ui

mui/material-ui shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, material-ui shows healthier maintenance signals than mantine. material-ui rates Healthy overall while mantine rates Mixed. mantine was committed to 2 weeks ago with 13+ active contributors, while material-ui was committed to 5 days ago with 23+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

mantinedev/mantine

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 3 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 86% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 13 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

mui/material-ui

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 23+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

mantinematerial-ui
Stars31,68599,028
Last commit15d ago5d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues641,463
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage14%4%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeB
Cycles3
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? mantinedev/mantine · mui/material-ui

Ask AI about mantinedev/mantine vs mui/material-ui

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.