mantinedev/mantine vs vuejs/vue
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, mantine and vue both show mixed maintenance signals. mantine was committed to 2 weeks ago with 13+ active contributors, while vue last saw a commit 1 year ago with 35+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mantinedev/mantine
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 3 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 86% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
vuejs/vue
Stale — last commit 2y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓35+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mantine | vue | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,685 | 212,464 |
| Last commit | 15d ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 64 | 640 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 14% | 74% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | B | — |
| Cycles | 3 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? mantinedev/mantine · vuejs/vue
Ask AI about mantinedev/mantine vs vuejs/vue
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.