marian42/wavefunctioncollapse vs unity-technologies/ml-agents
unity-technologies/ml-agents shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ml-agents shows healthier maintenance signals than wavefunctioncollapse. ml-agents rates Healthy overall while wavefunctioncollapse rates Mixed. wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 5 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while ml-agents last saw a commit 1 month ago with 27+ active contributors. wavefunctioncollapse is MIT-licensed while ml-agents is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
marian42/wavefunctioncollapse →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
last commit was 5y ago; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
unity-technologies/ml-agents →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wavefunctioncollapse | ml-agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,848 | 19,384 |
| Last commit | 5y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 9 | 50 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 95% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? marian42/wavefunctioncollapse · unity-technologies/ml-agents
Ask AI about marian42/wavefunctioncollapse vs unity-technologies/ml-agents
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.