mas-cli/mas vs p0deje/maccy
mas-cli/mas shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, mas shows healthier maintenance signals than maccy. mas rates Healthy overall while maccy rates Mixed. mas last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors, while maccy last saw a commit 4 months ago with 6+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mas-cli/mas →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
p0deje/maccy →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mas | maccy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,155 | 19,776 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 4mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 80 | 179 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? mas-cli/mas · p0deje/maccy
Ask AI about mas-cli/mas vs p0deje/maccy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.