RepoPilot

matomo-org/matomo vs umami-software/umami

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, matomo and umami both show healthy maintenance signals. matomo was committed to 1 week ago with 13+ active contributors, while umami was committed to 3 weeks ago with 8+ active contributors. matomo is GPL-3.0-licensed while umami is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

matomo-org/matomo

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit today
  • 13 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

umami-software/umami

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Last commit today
  • 8 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

matomoumami
Stars21,83938,347
Last commit12d ago23d ago
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
Open issues2,578102
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%12%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? matomo-org/matomo · umami-software/umami

Ask AI about matomo-org/matomo vs umami-software/umami

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.