meolu/walle-web vs z4nzu/hackingtool
z4nzu/hackingtool shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hackingtool shows healthier maintenance signals than walle-web. hackingtool rates Healthy overall while walle-web rates Mixed. walle-web last saw a commit 4 years ago with 14+ active contributors, while hackingtool last saw a commit 3 months ago with 10+ active contributors. walle-web is Apache-2.0-licensed while hackingtool is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
meolu/walle-web →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
z4nzu/hackingtool →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 8w ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| walle-web | hackingtool | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,015 | 73,012 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 3mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 392 | 100 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 16% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 2 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? meolu/walle-web · z4nzu/hackingtool
Ask AI about meolu/walle-web vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.