metacubex/mihomo vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
significant-gravitas/autogpt shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, autogpt shows healthier maintenance signals than mihomo. autogpt rates Healthy overall while mihomo rates Mixed. mihomo last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors, while autogpt was committed to today with 16+ active contributors. mihomo is MIT-licensed while autogpt is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
metacubex/mihomo →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 96% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
significant-gravitas/autogpt →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mihomo | autogpt | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,872 | 185,180 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | today |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 414 | 449 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? metacubex/mihomo · significant-gravitas/autogpt
Ask AI about metacubex/mihomo vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.