microsoft/napajs vs microsoft/wsl
microsoft/wsl shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, wsl shows healthier maintenance signals than napajs. wsl rates Healthy overall while napajs rates Mixed. napajs last saw a commit 3 years ago with 34+ active contributors, while wsl last saw a commit 1 month ago with 22+ active contributors. napajs is Other-licensed while wsl is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
microsoft/napajs →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 4y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
microsoft/wsl →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| napajs | wsl | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,184 | 32,194 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 64 | 953 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? microsoft/napajs · microsoft/wsl
Ask AI about microsoft/napajs vs microsoft/wsl
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.