microsoft/sudo vs thealgorithms/rust
microsoft/sudo shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, sudo shows healthier maintenance signals than rust. sudo rates Healthy overall while rust rates Mixed. sudo last saw a commit 11 months ago with 16+ active contributors, while rust last saw a commit 1 month ago with 13+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
microsoft/sudo →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
thealgorithms/rust →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| sudo | rust | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,827 | 25,829 |
| Last commit | 11mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 53 | 7 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 17% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 8 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? microsoft/sudo · thealgorithms/rust
Ask AI about microsoft/sudo vs thealgorithms/rust
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.