microsoft/typespec vs yuliskov/smarttube
microsoft/typespec shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, typespec shows healthier maintenance signals than smarttube. typespec rates Healthy overall while smarttube rates Mixed. typespec last saw a commit 1 month ago with 15+ active contributors, while smarttube last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. smarttube has no known critical CVEs, while typespec has 1.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
microsoft/typespec →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yuliskov/smarttube →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| typespec | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,717 | 30,059 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 1,144 | 713 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 7% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 1 high · 0 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? microsoft/typespec · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about microsoft/typespec vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.