microsoft/vscode vs mobxjs/mobx
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, vscode and mobx both show healthy maintenance signals. vscode was committed to today with 24+ active contributors, while mobx was committed to 2 days ago with 24+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
microsoft/vscode →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
mobxjs/mobx →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 33% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| vscode | mobx | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 186,836 | 28,191 |
| Last commit | today | 2d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 18,813 | 67 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 4% | 88% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? microsoft/vscode · mobxjs/mobx
Ask AI about microsoft/vscode vs mobxjs/mobx
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.