RepoPilot

microsoft/vscode vs nhn/tui.calendar

microsoft/vscode shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, vscode shows healthier maintenance signals than tui.calendar. vscode rates Healthy overall while tui.calendar rates Mixed. vscode was committed to today with 24+ active contributors, while tui.calendar last saw a commit 2 years ago with 7+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

microsoft/vscode

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
  • Last commit today
  • 24+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

nhn/tui.calendar

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • 7 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

vscodetui.calendar
Stars186,83612,639
Last committoday2y ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues18,813208
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage4%2%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? microsoft/vscode · nhn/tui.calendar

Ask AI about microsoft/vscode vs nhn/tui.calendar

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.