microsoft/wsl vs ramensoftware/windhawk
microsoft/wsl shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, wsl shows healthier maintenance signals than windhawk. wsl rates Healthy overall while windhawk rates Mixed. wsl last saw a commit 1 month ago with 22+ active contributors, while windhawk last saw a commit 6 months ago with 2+ active contributors. wsl is MIT-licensed while windhawk is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
microsoft/wsl →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ramensoftware/windhawk →
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 95% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wsl | windhawk | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 32,194 | 7,851 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 6mo ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 953 | 123 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 4% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? microsoft/wsl · ramensoftware/windhawk
Ask AI about microsoft/wsl vs ramensoftware/windhawk
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.