RepoPilot

miloyip/game-programmer vs sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement

Both showing Concerns signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, game-programmer and deeplpf-image-enhancement both show concerning maintenance signals. game-programmer last saw a commit 2 years ago with 9+ active contributors, while deeplpf-image-enhancement last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

miloyip/game-programmer

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • 9 active contributors

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 64% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • 4 active contributors

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

game-programmerdeeplpf-image-enhancement
Stars18,595257
Last commit2y ago1y ago
License
Open issues301
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineConcerns signalsConcerns signals

Want the full analysis? miloyip/game-programmer · sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement

Ask AI about miloyip/game-programmer vs sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.