RepoPilot

mlc-ai/mlc-llm vs tiangolo/fastapi

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, mlc-llm and fastapi both show healthy maintenance signals. mlc-llm last saw a commit 1 month ago with 22+ active contributors, while fastapi last saw a commit 2 months ago with 5+ active contributors. mlc-llm is Apache-2.0-licensed while fastapi is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

mlc-ai/mlc-llm

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • 1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
  • Last commit 5d ago
  • 22+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

tiangolo/fastapi

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
  • Last commit today
  • 5 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

mlc-llmfastapi
Stars23,08199,696
Last commit1mo ago2mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Open issues334100
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage13%100%
Dependency CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 lowNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? mlc-ai/mlc-llm · tiangolo/fastapi

Ask AI about mlc-ai/mlc-llm vs tiangolo/fastapi

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.