mobxjs/mobx vs redwoodjs/redwood
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of July 2026, mobx and redwood both show healthy maintenance signals. mobx was committed to 1 day ago with 24+ active contributors, while redwood was committed to 4 days ago with 16+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
mobxjs/mobx
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 33% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
redwoodjs/redwood
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mobx | redwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28,195 | 17,614 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 4d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 70 | 266 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 88% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? mobxjs/mobx · redwoodjs/redwood
Ask AI about mobxjs/mobx vs redwoodjs/redwood
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.